Opportunities and Challenges of Social Forestry Programs in the KHDPK Area (Case Study in Pati Regency, Central Java Province)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31258/jiik.8.2.77-86Keywords:
Social Forestry, KHDPK, Forest Farmer Groups, Opportunities and Challenges, Forest SustainabilityAbstract
Social forestry is defined as a forest management system, both in state forests and private forests that involve local communities as the main actors in forest management. This research was conducted to find out what opportunities and challenges are in the management of Special Management of State Forest (KHDPK) in Social Forestry scheme in Pati Regency. This research is descriptive exploratory with a qualitative approach. Primary data was obtained from interviews with key informants and field observations. Secondary data was obtained from literature studies and document studies from related agencies. Data analysis is carried out by Exploratory Descriptive method supported by the presentation of data in the form of images, graphs and diagrams. The results of this study can be reported that Pati Regency has 9 social forestry groups that have received a decision letter. The opportunity to implement Social Forestry and KHDPK in Pati Regency is that farmers get free access to manage land so that they can improve farmers' welfare. The challenge of social forestry management and KHDPK in Pati Regency is the low human resources of farmers which can cause conflicts and hinder the implementation of this program. There needs to be assistance and counseling for forest farmers and communities around the forest regarding the model of optimal forest management that is in accordance with the principles of ecosystem sustainability and concordant to soil and water conservation.
References
Abdul Khalil, H. P. S., Hossain, M. S., Rosamah, E., Azli, N. A., Saddon, N., Davoudpoura, Y., Islam,
M. N., & Dungani, R. (2015). The role of soil properties and it’s interaction towards quality plant
fiber: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 43, 1006–1015.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.11.099
De la Rosa, D. (2005). Soil quality evaluation and monitoring based on land evaluation. Land
Degradation and Development, 16(6), 551–559. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.710
Fardiansyah, D., Budhi Kusuma, A., & Trishuta Pathiassana, M. (2022). Kajian Penerapan Model
Agrosilvopastura Dalam Peningkatan Kesejahteraan Dan Pendapatan Kelompok Tani Hutan
Sorowua. Jurnal TAMBORA, 6(2), 66–77. https://doi.org/10.36761/jt.v6i2.2004
Hastanti, B. (2021). Stakeholder Analysis of Implementation of Social Forestry Program at KPH
Telawa, Central Java. Jurnal Wasian, 8(1), 11–23. https://doi.org/10.20886/jwas.v8i1.6154
Irawanti, S., Prawesti Suka, A., & Ekawati, S. (2012). Manfaat Ekonomi Dan Peluang Pengembangan
Hutan Rakyat Sengon Di Kabupaten Pati. Jurnal Penelitian Sosial Dan Ekonomi Kehutanan, 9(3),
126–139. https://doi.org/10.20886/jsek.2012.9.3.126-139
Latumahina, F. (2019). Kajian Dampak Perhutanan Sosial Maluku-Papua opt. July.
Nawangwulan, Bambang Sudarsono, I., & Sasmito, B. (2013). Analisis Pengaruh Lahan Pertanian
Terhadap Hasil Produk Tanaman Pangan Di Kabupaten Pati. Jurnal Geodesi UUndip, 2(2), 127–
140.
Nurfatriani, F. (2019). Efektivitas Kebijakan Alokasi Lahan 12,7 Juta Ha Untuk Perhutanan Sosial:
Studi Kasus Provinsi Nusa Tenggara Barat Dan Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. Jurnal Analisis
Kebijakan Kehutanan, 16(1), 47–66.
Prihantini, A. I., Krisnawati, K., Rahayu, A. A. D., Nugraheni, Y. M. M. A., & Samawandana, G. (2018).
Uji Fitokimia dan Aktivitas Antibakteri Tumbuhan Pranajiwa (Euchresta horsfieldii (Lesch.)
Benn.). Jurnal Ilmu Kehutanan, 12(2), 223. https://doi.org/10.22146/jik.40157
Raharjo, S. A. S., Hastanti, B. W., & Haryanti, N. (2020). Dinamika Kelembagaan Perhutanan Sosial di
Wilayah Pehutani: Studi Kasus di KPH Telawa, Jawa Tengah. Politika: Jurnal Ilmu Politik, 11(2),
183–197. https://doi.org/10.14710/politika.11.2.2020.183-197
Rahman, M. E. (2021). Pendampingan Program Perhutanan Sosial Masyarakat Desa Hutan Burno
Kabupaten Lumajang Menuju Pembangunan Berkelanjutan Indonesia 2030. Islamic Management,
3(2), 116. https://doi.org/10.18326/imej.v3i1.115-132
Ribot, J. C., & Peluso, N. L. (2003). A Theory of Access*.
Soegiono, S. L., & Sutanto, E. M. (2013). Restrukturisasi Organisasi di PT Samudra Alam Raya
Surabaya. Agora, 1(3), 1–9.
Toha, M., Wihadanto, A., & Nurhasanah, N. (2023). Dampak perhutanan sosial terhadap kesejahteraan
masyarakat sekitar hutan dalam mendukung kelestarian hutan di kota Tarakan. ULIN: Jurnal
Hutan Tropis, 7(2), 133. https://doi.org/10.32522/ujht.v7i2.10302
Wahyu Safitri, A., NOVIA YANTI, R., & Suwarno, E. (2023). Nilai Ekonomi Dan Kontribusi Hasil
Hutan Bukan Kayu Terhadap Pendapatan Masyarakat (Studi Kasus Pada Desa Halaban Kecamatan
Lareh Sago Halaban, Kabupaten 50 Kota, Sumatera Barat). Jurnal Belantara, 6(1), 69–79.
https://doi.org/10.29303/jbl.v6i1.921
Yudistiro, W., & Wicaksono, I. (2023). Kearifan Lokal Gapoktanhut Sabrang Mandiri dalam
Menghadapi Konflik Sebagai Penerima Akses Kelola Perhutanan Sosial di Kawasan Hutan Desa
Sabrang Ambulu Jember. Pubmedia Social Sciences and Humanities, 1(2), 1–10.