Pembelajaran Kelembagaan Nasional dan Internasional untuk Penguatan Tata Kelola Lingkungan melalui Teori Bedah Jantung
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31258/jiik.9.2.%25pKeywords:
heart surgery theory, cantelan (lock) mechanism, environmental governance, spatial-temporal integration, mutual accountability.Abstract
The Heart Surgery Theory emerges from the ongoing governance crisis in Indonesia's environmental sector, characterized by institutional fragmentation and sectoral disconnection. This theory proposes a collaborative governance approach that emphasizes spatial and temporal synchronization combined with the application of mutual accountability across sectors. The Cantelan mechanism anchors budgetary allocations (DIPA/DPA) to specific priority locations, ensuring the simultaneous presence of forestry, environment, public works, agriculture, and social sectors in critical ecosystems. This study applies a reflective literature review combined with lessons from national and international practices, including TVA (United States), MDBA (Australia), and ICPR (Europe). The results indicate that spatial-temporal locking and mutual accountability reduce bureaucratic inefficiencies, close governance loopholes, and strengthen bureaucratic integrity in ecosystem restoration efforts.
References
Agustin, Y., Ramadhani, S., & Darmawan, D. (2023). Fragmentasi kelembagaan pengelolaan DAS di Indonesia. Jurnal Tata Kelola Lingkungan, 14(2), 111–125.
Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571.
Bappenas. (2020). Voluntary National Review (VNR) 2020: Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) Indonesia. Jakarta: Kementerian Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional/Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional. https://sdgs.bappenas.go.id
Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: SAGE Publications.
Flyvbjerg, B. (2001). Making social science matter: Why social inquiry fails and how it can succeed again. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
International Commission for the Protection of the Rhine (ICPR). (2023). Rhine 2040: Programme on sustainable development of the Rhine. Koblenz: ICPR Secretariat.
Murray–Darling Basin Authority (MDBA). (2024). Basin Plan Evaluation 2024 Summary Report. Canberra: MDBA.
OECD. (2005). Modernising government: The way forward. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Robbins, P. (2020). Political ecology: A critical introduction (3rd ed.). Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell.
Sayer, J., Sunderland, T., Ghazoul, J., Pfund, J.-L., Sheil, D., Meijaard, E., … & Buck, L. E. (2013). Ten principles for a landscape approach to reconciling agriculture, conservation, and other competing land uses. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(21), 8349–8356.
Schlosberg, D. (2007). Defining environmental justice: Theories, movements, and nature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Simanjuntak, H. (2021). Paradigma rehabilitasi dan reklamasi kawasan hutan. Makassar: Nas Media Pustaka.
Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA). (2023). Integrated Resource Plan 2023. Knoxville: TVA.
UNDP. (2023). Human Development Report 2023: Breaking the Gridlock—Reimagining cooperation in a polarized world. New York: United Nations Development Programme.
Yulianti, D., Satria, A., & Widiastuti, F. (2022). Fragmentasi spasial-temporal pengelolaan DAS di Indonesia. Jurnal Kebijakan Lingkungan, 10(1), 55–70.
